Request for access to documents held by IP Australia relating to a trademark application by DPP Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd — Whether disclosure would unreasonably affect organisation in respect of its lawful business affairs — Whether contrary to public interest to release conditionally exempt document

Request for access to documents held by Services Australia ‘associated in any way to the Child Support of [two named children]’— Whether practical refusal reason exists

Request for access to documents relating to the costs associated with overseas assignment of AFP officers, including investigations and representations— Whether disclosure would have adverse effect on management or assessment of personnel — Whether contrary to public interest to release conditionally exempt documents

Request for access to correspondence sent by the National Competition Council (NCC) to other agencies, including the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, that explains why the NCC sought to participate in Court proceedings by the Port of Newcastle and costs incurred by the NCC in doing so — Scope of the request — Whether reasonable steps taken to find documents — Whether documents subject to legal professional privilege

Request for access to all records held by Services Australia — Whether a practical refusal reason exists

Request for access to documents relating to costs associated with a specific overseas assignment of AFP officers, any investigation into these costs and any representations made by a minister, member of parliament or senator in this matter — Whether disclosure would have adverse effect on management or assessment of personnel — Whether contrary to public interest to release conditionally exempt documents

All documents relating to the applicant — Whether a practical refusal reason exists

The document first approved by the Minister proposing the policy of establishing or implementing Taskforce Integrity — Whether material in documents irrelevant to request — Whether reasonable steps taken to find documents — Whether documents brought into existence for the dominant purpose of briefing a Minister on a Cabinet document — Whether disclosure of documents would reveal Cabinet deliberation or decision — Whether documents contain deliberative matter prepared for deliberative purpose — Whether contrary to the public interest to release conditionally exempt documentsÂ