Privacy and FOI advice for the COVID-19 pandemic. Learn more
Main menu
- About us
-
Privacy
- For individuals
- For organisations and agencies
- Law
-
Freedom of information
- For individuals
- For agencies
- Law
- Information policy
-
Consumer Data Right
- For consumers
- For participants
- Law
Information Commissioner review decisions
RSS feedThe OAIC reviews decisions made under the FOI Act.
The AustLII website provides a comprehensive database search service of IC review decisions as part of the Australian Information Commissioner (AICmr) series.
Total results: 826
Documents relating to the applicant — Whether a practical refusal reason existsÂ
All information held by the Department about the applicant — Whether disclosure would cause damage to security of the Commonwealth — Whether disclosure would have substantial adverse effect on the proper and efficient conduct of agency operations — Whether disclosure of personal information unreasonable — Whether contrary to the public interest to release conditionally exempt documentsÂ
Documents relating to the applicant’s role or record as a registered ASIC agent or officer or any company or any matter relating to the applicant — Whether reasonable steps taken to find documents — Whether disclosure would have substantial adverse effect on the proper and efficient conduct of agency operations
Documents concerning regulatory action taken by ASIC against Henry Morgan Limited under the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to a bonus option prospectus — Whether disclosure would unreasonably affect an organisation in respect of its lawful business affairs — Whether contrary to the public interest to release conditionally exempt documents
Documents concerning Gadens Lawyers Brisbane in matters involving a third party individual and related businesses — Whether disclosure would unreasonably affect an organisation in respect of its lawful business affairs
Documents regarding complaints and investigations made about the Australian Christian Lobby — Whether disclosure would have substantial adverse effect on proper and efficient conduct of agency operations — Whether contrary to public interest to release conditionally exempt documents
Request for access to Centrelink documents compiled for Ombudsman – Whether a practical refusal reason exists – Whether request consultation process followed – Whether work involved in processing request would substantially and unreasonably divert agency resources from other operationsÂ
Documents relating to vaccination exemption —Whether documents contain deliberative matter prepared for deliberative process — Whether contrary to public interest to release conditionally exempt documents
Information Commissioner review decisions
RSS feedThe OAIC reviews decisions made under the FOI Act.
The AustLII website provides a comprehensive database search service of IC review decisions as part of the Australian Information Commissioner (AICmr) series.
Total results: 789. Show all results
Whether disclosure would cause damage to the security of the Commonwealth — Whether documents contain deliberative matter prepared for a deliberative purpose — Whether disclosure would unreasonably affect an organisation in respect of its lawful business affairs — Whether contrary to the public interest to release conditionally exempt documents
Whether reasonable steps taken to find documents — Whether disclosure would prejudice lawful methods or procedures — Whether disclosure would have a substantial adverse effect on the proper and efficient conduct of the operations of an agency — Whether disclosure is contrary to the public interest
Whether documents subject to legal professional privilege — Whether disclosure of personal information unreasonable — Whether disclosure would have substantial adverse effect on the proper and efficient conduct of the operations of the agency — Whether disclosure would unreasonably affect an organisation in respect of its lawful business affairs — Whether contrary to the public interest to release conditionally exempt documents
Whether documents subject to legal professional privilege — Whether documents contain deliberative matter prepared for a deliberative process —Whether disclosure would have a substantial adverse effect on the management of personnel — Whether disclosure of personal information unreasonable — Whether contrary to the public interest to release conditionally exempt documents
Whether reasonable steps taken to find documents
Whether document was brought into existence for the dominant purpose of submission for consideration by Cabinet