Privacy and FOI advice for the COVID-19 pandemic. Learn more
Main menu
- About us
-
Privacy
- For individuals
- For organisations and agencies
- Law
-
Freedom of information
- For individuals
- For agencies
- Law
- Information policy
-
Consumer Data Right
- For consumers
- For participants
- Law
Information Commissioner review decisions
RSS feedThe OAIC reviews decisions made under the FOI Act.
The AustLII website provides a comprehensive database search service of IC review decisions as part of the Australian Information Commissioner (AICmr) series.
Total results: 826
Human resource records relating to the applicant’s conduct and working arrangements — Whether disclosure would have a substantial adverse effect on the management or assessment of personnel
KPMG and Ernst & Young reports for review of Commonwealth Courts — Whether disclosure would damage Commonwealth-State relations — Whether documents contain deliberative matter prepared for a deliberative purpose — Whether disclosure would have a substantial adverse effect on the financial or property interests of the Commonwealth — Whether disclosure of personal information unreasonable — Whether contrary to the public interest to release conditionally exempt documents
Documents about a complaint about a service provider including file notes of phone calls, emails and internal reports of the ACQSC about the provider — Documents to which secrecy provisions of enactments apply — Whether reasonable steps taken to locate documents
Correspondence about the applicant as employee — Whether material in the documents is irrelevant to the request — Whether documents contain deliberative matter prepared for a deliberative purpose — Whether disclosure of personal information unreasonableÂ
Emails, attachments and documents identified in a previous FOI request — Whether disclosure would have a substantial adverse effect on the management or assessment of personnel — Whether disclosure contrary to public interest
Documents related to the applicant and family member’s visa applications — Whether disclosure would prejudice lawful methods or procedures — Whether disclosure would have a substantial adverse effect on agency operations — Whether disclosure contrary to the public interest
Documents relating to the ‘Pay As You Go’ data matching initiative — Whether documents brought into existence for the dominant purpose of briefing a Minister on a Cabinet document — Whether disclosure would prejudice lawful methods or procedures — Whether document contains deliberative matter prepared for a deliberative process — Whether disclosure would have a substantial adverse effect on agency operations — Whether disclosure contrary to public interest
Request for correspondence between the Indigenous Land Corporation and the Prime Minister or the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet as referred to in a departmental brief about the purchase of Ayers Rock Resort — Whether material obtained in confidence
Information Commissioner review decisions
RSS feedThe OAIC reviews decisions made under the FOI Act.
The AustLII website provides a comprehensive database search service of IC review decisions as part of the Australian Information Commissioner (AICmr) series.
Total results: 789. Show all results
Whether disclosure would cause damage to the security of the Commonwealth — Whether documents contain deliberative matter prepared for a deliberative purpose — Whether disclosure would unreasonably affect an organisation in respect of its lawful business affairs — Whether contrary to the public interest to release conditionally exempt documents
Whether reasonable steps taken to find documents — Whether disclosure would prejudice lawful methods or procedures — Whether disclosure would have a substantial adverse effect on the proper and efficient conduct of the operations of an agency — Whether disclosure is contrary to the public interest
Whether documents subject to legal professional privilege — Whether disclosure of personal information unreasonable — Whether disclosure would have substantial adverse effect on the proper and efficient conduct of the operations of the agency — Whether disclosure would unreasonably affect an organisation in respect of its lawful business affairs — Whether contrary to the public interest to release conditionally exempt documents
Whether documents subject to legal professional privilege — Whether documents contain deliberative matter prepared for a deliberative process —Whether disclosure would have a substantial adverse effect on the management of personnel — Whether disclosure of personal information unreasonable — Whether contrary to the public interest to release conditionally exempt documents
Whether reasonable steps taken to find documents
Whether document was brought into existence for the dominant purpose of submission for consideration by Cabinet